Legal Opinion

(PC) Newsome v. Loterzstain

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 19, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00307Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, No. 2:19-cv-307-JAM-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. LOTERZSTAIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 The court dismissed his first amended complaint (ECF No. 14) and he now proceeds with his 19 second amended complaint (ECF No. 18). The court must screen it. 20 Screening 21 I. Legal Standards 22 Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the 23…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API