Legal Opinion
Potoma v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 28, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01153Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LYDIA POTOMA, ) CASE NO. 1:23-cv-01153 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN ) v. ) ) THE CLEVELAND CLINIC ) MEMORANDUM OPINION FOUNDATION, et al., ) AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) Defendants The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“CCF”) and Jerilyn Hagan (“Hagan”) moved this Court for summary judgment. (Doc. 21.) Plaintiff Lydia Potoma (“Potoma”) opposed the motion (Doc. 24), and Defendants replied (Doc. 29). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.