Legal Opinion

Peavler v. Law Firm of Krisor & Associates

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided August 21, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00080-TWP-TABPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS

TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Joann Peavler’s (“Ms. Peavler”) Motion for Assessment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Filing No. 15). On April 8, 2014, Ms. Peavler filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). Defendant, The Law Firm of Krisor & Associates (“Krisor”) opposed the motion, and Ms. Peavler filed a reply and a Supplemental Motion for Attorney’s Fees. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 17,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Nicole Gas Production, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
  2. Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API