Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Pickens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1953No. 35802PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORN, Justice.

On October 11, 1951, plaintiff, as a holder in due course, sued the defendant Pick-ens, to recover upon a promissory nóte 'executed by him and which was past due and unpaid. Personal service was had upon defendant, who employed counsel to defend the action. Such counsel filed a Special Appearance and Motion to Quash which was overruled, and thereafter filed a motion to require plaintiff to furnish copies of the petition and exhibits. This motion was overruled upon showing of compliance therewith, and defendant was allowed time to plead. January 14, 1952, a minute was entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Donley v. DonleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Long v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. PharaohSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Sandusky v. Graham and Associates, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Crawford Ex Rel. Crawford v. GipsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Crawford Ex Rel. Crawford v. GipsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API