Legal Opinion
Wolma v. Gonzalez
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided December 31, 1991No. 04-91-00609-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON RELATORS’ PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CHAPA, Justice.
Relators bring this original mandamus proceeding challenging a trial court order imposing Tex.R.Civ.P. 13 sanctions against them. Because relators had an adequate remedy in an appeal of the sanction order, mandamus will not lie.
Relator, William Wolma, sued the real party in interest for malpractice. The second relator is Carl Pipoly, Wolma’s attorney in the malpractice suit. The parties to the malpractice suit subsequently reached a settlement agreement whereby Wolma nonsuited his claim. Respondent, the Honorable Charles Gonzalez,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Check v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Scott & White Memorial Hospital v. SchexniderTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Monroe v. Grider, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Jobe v. Lapidus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Greiner v. Jameson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.