Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scovill Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Dateline Electric Co., Ltd., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 15, 1972No. 71-1344Published

1DissentEnoch, Senior Circuit Judge

(dis-

senting) .

Reluctantly I find myself in disagreement with my colleagues in this matter. *901I have, therefore, carefully reviewed the circumstances of this case in some detail, as follows.

It is plaintiff’s view that defendant, an English manufacturer, is suable in Illinois under § 17(1) (a) because it regularly solicits private label contracts from American companies twice yearly at the industry trade show in Chicago and that personal jurisdiction also attaches to the breach of contract claims, which plaintiff sees as closely related to, and as arising from, the same business relationship…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. Koplin v. Thomas, Haab & BottsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API