Legal Opinion
Tiarks v. First National Bank of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 20, 1966No. 1 Div. 149PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
The xxnderwriters appeal from a judgment for the assured in an action for breach of a contract denominated “Lloyd’s Banks’ and Trust Companies’ Policy.”
By the terms of the contract, the underwriters agree to pay and make good to the assured all losses that assured may, during the specified period, discover that assured has sustained in the manner mentioned in the contract, subject always to the terms, exclusions, conditions and limitations thereof, that is to say:
“2. Premises. By reason of any Px-opexty being lost through theft or larceny (whether common-law or statutory), or…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- State Bank of Poplar Bluff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- The Exchange National Bank of Olean v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Pacific Insurance Co. v. The Idaho First National Bank, the Idaho First National Bank, Cross-Appellant v. United Pacific Insurance Co., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Gregory Vincent HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United Pacific Insurance v. Idaho First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Fidelity and Casualty Company v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.