People v. Nesseth

From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial after being found guilty of one count of grand theft and two counts of forgery, defendant appeals.

Defendant urges that there was not substantial evidence to sustain the judgments of guilty on any count. This contention is untenable, as will appear from the evidence hereinafter set forth in support of each count of which defendant was convicted.

I

Count pertaining to the Lackey Grand Theft.

There is no merit in defendant’s contentions that (a) there was no evidence that he intended to defraud the Lackeys; (b) the evidence shows he did not…