Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Amero
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 30, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
These are two actions of tort: the first by the minor plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision of automobiles, and the second by her father to recover for consequential damages. The declaration in each case contains two counts: count 1 alleging negligence on the part of the defendant, and count 2 alleging violation by the defendant of the provisions of G. L. c. 89, § 1.
The plaintiff in each case seasonably claimed trial by jury. The defendant did not claim such trial in either case. The actions were referred to an auditor without provision that his findings were to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Inhabitants of Wakefield v. American Surety Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Morrison v. Selectmen of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Brown v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Ballou v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Tilton v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Ring v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Beloin v. BullettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.