Rose v. Long Island Railroad Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
This case brings before us, for the second time, the question of whether the Long Island Railroad’s (“LIRR”) pension plan is *912a “governmental plan” within the meaning of section 3(32) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(32), and is therefore exempt from compliance with Title I of that statute. See 29 U.S.C. § 1003(b)(1). The issue arises in the context of Mary Rose’s suit for survivor’s benefits, to which she claims entitlement pursuant to section 205(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1055(a). Following a ■ remand from this court in 1982,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mary Smith v. Regional Transit Authority, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Shannon v. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Indumati Roy v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association and College Retirement Equities FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- State of Michigan and Michigan Education Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.