Legal Opinion

People v. MAGLAYA

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 2003No. C043236PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

In this case we hold that the trial court properly allowed a nonexpert police officer to testify that shoeprints found in the dirt at the scene of a crime were “similar” to the pattern on the soles of defendant’s shoes.

Defendant Jayson Allen Maglaya was convicted by a jury of first degree attempted burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 459; further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code). Defendant also admitted a prior serious felony and prior prison term. He was sentenced to seven years in state prison. Defendant appeals, claiming the court erred in allowing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. ZismerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. ChappleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. State v. WintersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. WintersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. James CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API