People v. MAGLAYA
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
In this case we hold that the trial court properly allowed a nonexpert police officer to testify that shoeprints found in the dirt at the scene of a crime were “similar” to the pattern on the soles of defendant’s shoes.
Defendant Jayson Allen Maglaya was convicted by a jury of first degree attempted burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 459; further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code). Defendant also admitted a prior serious felony and prior prison term. He was sentenced to seven years in state prison. Defendant appeals, claiming the court erred in allowing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. ZismerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. ChappleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- State v. WintersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. WintersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. James CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.