General Electric Co. v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $1,583.60, balance of the purchase price of certain electric drills. Prom an order, Cant, J., overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the answer, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order overruling its demurrers to the answer and alleged counterclaims of the defendant, on the ground that the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense or counterclaim.
It appears from the complaint that the Port Wayne Electric Works, a corporation, on December 17, 1910, entered into a written contract with the defendant, whereby it sold to him certain rock drills and equipment for the agreed price of $1,550, payable one-half in cash and the remainder within thirty days; and for a second cause of action the plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Red River & Lake of the Woods Railroad v. StureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Haven v. NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Alworth v. GordonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Vilett v. MolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ganley Brothers, Inc. v. Butler Brothers Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Nygard v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Edward Thompson Co. v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- General Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.