Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 27, 1923No. 3983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of violating section 2 of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Law (38 Stat. 785 [Comp. St. § 6287h]), by selling to a named person “one-sixteenth (1/i«th) of an ounce of morphine, the same being a compound of opium, not in the regular course” of his professional practice as a physician, and not for the treatment of any disease, but for the purpose of satisfying the craving of one addicted to the use of' morphine.

*683'The trial court admitted evidence of other sales and of administering morphine by the plaintiff in error to the same person on many other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guilbeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  2. James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  3. Dysart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard AlstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Charles SchrenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. PisanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Jiminez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API