Williams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was convicted of violating section 2 of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Law (38 Stat. 785 [Comp. St. § 6287h]), by selling to a named person “one-sixteenth (1/i«th) of an ounce of morphine, the same being a compound of opium, not in the regular course” of his professional practice as a physician, and not for the treatment of any disease, but for the purpose of satisfying the craving of one addicted to the use of' morphine.
*683'The trial court admitted evidence of other sales and of administering morphine by the plaintiff in error to the same person on many other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guilbeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Dysart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Richard AlstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Charles SchrenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. PisanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Hoffman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Jiminez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.