Legal Opinion

Jiminez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1970No. 69-78PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge.

Angel Jiminez was charged and convicted in a non-jury trial of conspiracy to commit a felony, unlawful sale of heroin and unlawful possession of heroin. He appeals from his conviction for these charges.

We find from an examination of the record that there was sufficient competent evidence to sustain his convictions and sentences on the charges of conspiracy to commit a felony and unlawful possession of heroin.

The information also charged Jiminez with unlawful sale of a certain narcotic drug, to wit: heroin, a derivative of opium. The state produced evidence of the unlawful sale by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Guilbeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  3. Penny v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. McIntosh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SobelSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Ramon Duran Guillen v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Atwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Salas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API