Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1927No. 7570PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error under various aliases was indicted in the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota on four counts charging violation of the so-called Harrison Anti-Narcotie Act (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q). As she was acquitted on the first two counts of the indictment, consideration thereof ' is unnecessary. She was found guilty on the third and fourth counts. The third count charged that plaintiff in error, being a person required to register under the terms of the act of' Congress approved December 17, 1914, unlawfully dealt in, dispensed,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Braden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Weare v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Mathews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Vause v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Read v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Arnold J. Uhl v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus Johnson, I. H. Eskridge v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.