Legal Opinion

Hall-Woolford Tank Co. v. R.F. Kilns, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1997PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

In November of 1995, Jack Hillman, general manager of Hall-Woolford Tank Co., Inc., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, contacted Theodore Hartman, the president of R.F. Kilns, Inc., of Salamanca, New York, to inquire about the feasibility and cost of certain lumber-drying services. More particularly, Hillman told Hartman that he was contemplating buying a quantity of red cypress wood from Florida for use in Hall-Woolford’s construction of wooden tanks and fermen-ters. Because the red cypress had a high moisture content, however, it needed to be professionally dryed prior to use.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kubik v. LetteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. King v. Detroit Tool Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Derman v. Wilair Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. McCall v. Formu-3 International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Efford v. Jockey ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Sulkava v. Glaston Finland OySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Nutrition Management Services Co. v. HinchcliffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. Alden Surgical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API