Legal Opinion

Sulkava v. Glaston Finland Oy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2012PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.:

In these consolidated appeals, Kim Sul-kava (“Sulkava”), as Administratrix of the Estate of her late husband, Jarmo Sulkava (“the decedent”), and in her own right, appeals from two separate Orders, one of which granted the Preliminary Objections (“PO’s”) filed by Rochester Insulated Glass (“RIG”), and the other Order granted the PO’s filed by Uniglass Engineering Oy (“Uniglass”) and Glaston Finland Oy (collectively “the Glaston Finnish entities”), Glaston USA, Inc., Glaston America, Inc., and Glaston North America, Inc. (collectively “the Glaston American entities”),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Derman v. Wilair Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Hall-Woolford Tank Co. v. R.F. Kilns, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Slota v. Moorings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. TCPF LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. SkatellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Walker, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. In re Barnes FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Fulano, J. v. Fanjul Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Alma v. Monroe County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Calabro v. SocolofskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API