Legal Opinion
Dayton Bread Co. v. Montana Flour Mills Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1942No. Nos. 8927, 8928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellee in No. 8927 and appellant in No. 8928, Montana Flour Mills Company, instituted this action against appellant in No. 8927, and appellee in No. 8928, the Dayton Bread Company, to recover liquidated damages for the breach of a contract of sale of 5,000 barrels of flour. The Dayton Bread Company admits the execution of the contract, but insists that it is void under Sections 13069 and 13070, inclusive, of the Ohio Statutes (Gen.Code).
At the conclusion of the evidence, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the Montana Flour Mills Company in the sum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Lapice v. WolperIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Otis & Hough v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1914
- Taylor v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hawke v. Roberts & HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orchard Group, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Konica Medical Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Bass. Bass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Anderson v. the International Union, United Plant Guard Workers of America Upgwa)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Yolton v. El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Hux v. ButlerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.