Legal Opinion

Hawke v. Roberts & Hall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county. On Application for rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Plaintiff in error, George S. Hawke, has made application for a rehearing herein, and has also made a motion to correct the bill of exceptions. In support of the motion affidavits are offered on the part of the plaintiff in error to the effect that the bill of exceptions does in fact contain all the evidence offered at the trial, although the certificate of the trial judge does not so show. A counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of the defendants in error to the effect that not all of the evidence is contained in the bill of exceptions.

The question, on which the original opinion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Otis & Hough v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dayton Bread Co. v. Montana Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Ekleberry v. SanfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Robertson v. LynchOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API