Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 29, 1960No. 4795PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The judicial approach in this state to scientific evidence generally and chemical tests for intoxication in particular was indicated in State v. Reenstierna, 101 N. H. 286, 287. In that case it was stated that the “utilization of probative methods developed by modern medicine and science as an aid for a judge or jury to determine disputed questions of fact has received hospitable recognition in this state by both judicial decision and statute.” The legislative approach since 1949 is indicated by RSA 262:20 which provides that “the court may admit evidence of the amount of alcohol in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. City of Seattle v. BryanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Wichita v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Orville E. Stifel, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. State v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Pruitt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API