Legal Opinion

Brittain v. Cubbon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1963No. 42,626PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is a negligence action based upon the doctrine of attractive nuisance. It is brought on behalf of a ten-year-old child to recover for injuries received on the defendant’s premises when the child stepped on a nail and was allegedly injured. The *642trial court overruled a demurrer to the amended petition, and appeal has been duly perfected from such ruling.

The only question presented is whether the pleading states a cause of action under the attractive nuisance doctrine.

The amended petition alleged that the plaintiff, Michael J. Brittain,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tavis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Moseley v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Cassity v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. CoppleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  3. Bartlett v. HeerscheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Caywood v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Carter v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API