Brittain v. Cubbon
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schroeder, J.:
This is a negligence action based upon the doctrine of attractive nuisance. It is brought on behalf of a ten-year-old child to recover for injuries received on the defendant’s premises when the child stepped on a nail and was allegedly injured. The *642trial court overruled a demurrer to the amended petition, and appeal has been duly perfected from such ruling.
The only question presented is whether the pleading states a cause of action under the attractive nuisance doctrine.
The amended petition alleged that the plaintiff, Michael J. Brittain,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tavis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Moseley v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Cassity v. BradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. CoppleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Bartlett v. HeerscheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Caywood v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Carter v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.