Legal Opinion

Carter v. Skelly Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1963No. 43,145PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*475The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is a negligence action based upon the doctrine of attractive nuisance. It is brought by the administrators of the estate of William E. Carter, deceased, pursuant to authorization granted by the probate court. The trial court overruled the joint and separate demurrers filed by the defendants, and appeal has been duly perfected from such orders.

The only question presented is whether the pleadings state a cause of action under the attractive nuisance doctrine.

The petition alleged that the plaintiffs, the parents of the deceased child,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Moseley v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  3. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Manley v. HallbauerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. Carter v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API