Legal Opinion
C.A.H. v. L.H.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 12, 1993No. 23898PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Justice:
This is a domestic case. The family court granted Respondent C.A.H. (Wife) alimony and equitably divided the martial property. Appellant L.H. (Husband) appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
After Wife and Husband were married on April 6, 1985, Wife moved into Husband’s house. Wife left the martial home on February 8,1991, after her daughters from a previous marriage told her Husband had sexually abused them. Wife petitioned the family court for a divorce on the ground of adultery. The abuse is the basis for the adultery. In her petition, Wife sought equitable distribution and “relocation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Ellis v. PROCTER AND GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. TannerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Hickman v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Patterson v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Anderson Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. HagenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.