Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Rancho Santa Barbara
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2000No. 98-56204PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Michael Shawn Taylor, age 41, bought a mobile home that was located in a mobile *934home park, which rents the lot under the privately owned unit to qualified renters. When Taylor learned that spaces would not be rented to persons under 55 years of age, he sued in the district court to challenge as unconstitutional the state and federal statutes that permit park operators to enforce age restrictions. He appeals the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The federal Fair Housing Act and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Galyna Semienovna Halaim and Mariya Semienovna Halaim v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Campbell v. State, Department of Social and Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Petzak v. Nevada Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.