Legal Opinion

Szemis v. Szlachta

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff in this action sought to recover a real estate dealer’s commission on the sale hy the defendants of their real estate on Fairmont Avenue in Philadelphia together with the restaurant business which they had conducted on the premises. Defendants on June 23, 1949 agreed in writing to sell the above property, including restaurant and bar fixtures to one Nicholas D. George for a total of |18,000. The purchase price was paid to them by the purchaser at the time of settlement on August 16, 1949. Plaintiff asserted the right to a commission on the sale by virtue of an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Turner v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Wilson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Decarlo v. FrameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Mazer v. KannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solid Waste Institute, Inc. v. Sanitary Disposal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Whiteman & Co. v. FideiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Byrne v. BushkoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Assalone v. S-L Distribution Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Prosak v. Motts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API