Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Pickens

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 10, 1919No. Nos. 25 and 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR TO the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. The cases are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

These cases were submitted together and involve but a single question, which turns upon the effect to be given to the provisions of the Supplemental Agreement with the Choctaw and Chickasaw tribes of Indians (Act of July 1, 1902, c. 1362, 32 Stat. 641) relating to the allotment of the tribal lands. . In each case an enrolled Indian died subsequent to the ratification of the Agreement and before selection of an allotment; in each case the personal representative selected lands for allotment in the name of the deceased Indian, which shortly afterwards were attempted to be conveyed by the heirs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Gritts v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Sizemore v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Crews v. BurchamSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Bunch v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Minshall v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Brown v. MinshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Cleveland Boat Service, Inc. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API