Legal Opinion

Moore v. Preferred Research, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1989No. 77867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

In 1979, plaintiffs Earnest N. Moore and Preferred Research of Atlanta, Inc., entered into a written licensing agreement with defendant Preferred Research, Inc. (PRI) for exclusive rights in a specified territory to certain “techniques and procedures” developed by PRI “in the fields of courthouse records research and verification, credit investigations, examination of records effecting title to real estate and personal property and related services . . . .” The agreement contained a covenant not to compete whereby the plaintiffs agreed not to engage “in a similar business to that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watson v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Barry v. Stanco Communications Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Edwards v. Howe Richardson Scale Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Pierce v. Industrial Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Wilson v. Center Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Chaichimansour v. Pets Are People Too, No. 2, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Johnstone v. Tom's Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. General Assurance of America, Inc. v. Overby-Seawell Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  5. Patricia Kennedy v. the Shave Barber Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API