Legal Opinion

American Zinc Products Co. v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

If this intervention, as appears to be the case from the allegations of the petition, be considered a proceeding to set aside and cancel the mortgage from the Port Smith Spelter Company to the American Zinc Products Company as fraudulent and giving a preference to the creditors of an insolvent corporation, it must fail, as not having been commenced within 90 days after the execution of the mortgage complained of, as the law requires, since the mortgage sought, to be foreclosed was recorded on June' 24,1924, as alleged in the intervention, which was not filed until October 14, 1925, more than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Arlington Hotel Co. v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. MacOn v. LecroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Nedry v. VaileSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. G. W. Jones Lumber Co. v. Wisarkana Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Austin v. Dermott Canning Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API