Legal Opinion

Hall's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1915No. Appeal, No. 292PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal, No. 292, Jan. T., 1914, by George Baymond Hall, from decree of O. O. Philadelphia Co., Jan. T., 1907, No. 182, dismissing exceptions to adjudication, in Estate of George W. Hall, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. Before Gummey, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the exceptions in the opinion by Anderson, J. George Baymond Hall appealed. Error assigned was in dismissing the exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

George W. Hall, the testator, died December 14,1906, leaving a will wherein he devised and bequeathed to his executors an undivided one-half part of his residuary estate in trust to invest the same and pay the net income thereof to his son, George Raymond Hall, until he should arrive at the age of thirty years. And at the expiration of that time to grant and convey to the son, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, “the entire principal of the estate so given to them in trust,” with the remainder over, in case of the son’s death before reaching the age…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of BeckPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County · 1890
  2. Estate of GoePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Allegheny County · 1892
  3. Siegwarth's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kelly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estes v. EstesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Sheridan v. KrauseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API