Estate of Goe
Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Allegheny County
No. 121 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 71 December Term 1891, O. C. On January 15, 1891, the account of R. S. Goe, executor of the will of Catharine Goe, deceased, showing a balance of personalty for distribution to the legatees, was called for audit.
Read the full summary
No. 121 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 71 December Term 1891, O. C. On January 15, 1891, the account of R. S. Goe, executor of the will of Catharine Goe, deceased, showing a balance of personalty for distribution to the legatees, was called for audit. By her will, dated February 15, 1888, and duly admitted to probate, Mrs. Catharine Goe bequeathed and devised to her nine children, including John S. Goe, all her estate, real, personal and mixed, of whatever nature or kind and wheresoever the same should be at the time of her death, share and share alike; providing further:…
1Opinion of the Court
Per. Curiam :
By agreement of counsel filed, the issue here is narrowed down to the single question, whether “ the legacy given to the said John S. Goe by the said testatrix, is attachable by appellant in the hands of her executor.”
The will of Catharine Goe, the testatrix, contains the following clause:
“ It is my distinct will and desire that none of the effects, real, personal or mixed, as above devised and bequeathed to my children, orto either of them, can be seized upon or levied upon for any debt or claim whatsoever against my husband, Henry B. Goe, ór against any one of my said children.”
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Estate of BeckPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Hall's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hahn v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Sproul-Bolton v. Sproul-BoltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Mullin v. TrolingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.