State v. Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Justice.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon. Specifically, we address whether the State presented substantial evidence that (1) the victim’s money was taken via the use or threatened use of a dangerous weapon and (2) the victim’s life was endangered or threatened by the assailant’s possession, use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon during the course of the robbery. Viewing the evidence under the well-established standard of review, we conclude that the State…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. CrockettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. CalderonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.