State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where exceptional circumstances do not exist to justify suspending our Rules of Appellate Procedure and reaching an issue pursuant to Rule 2, we will not address defendants’ argument. Where the trial court’s jury instructions clearly required that the State prove defendants were the perpetrators of the crimes charged, we find no plain error by the trial court’s failure to give a specific instruction regarding identity. Where there is no such offense as “aggravated common law robbery” in North Carolina, we find no plain error in the trial court’s failure to give such an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. KinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022