Legal Opinion

In Re Kaufman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2005No. 05-BG-396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”), accepting the report of a Hearing Committee, has found that respondent violated Rules 8.1(b) (failure to respond to disciplinary authority) and 8.4(d) (serious interference with the administration of justice) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 2(b)(3) (failure to comply with an order of the Board).

Respondent’s misconduct occurred during the course of Bar Counsel’s investigation of a disciplinary complaint filed against him. In the course of that investigation, respondent did not respond to Bar Counsel’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re HitselbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re MabryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In re SaperoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API