Legal Opinion

Lynchburg Traction & Light Co. v. City of Lynchburg

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burks, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.'

This was an action by the city of Lynchburg against the Lynchburg Traction and Light Company to recover for certain repairs made by the city to portions of its streets occupied by the tracks of the traction company. An account was filed with the notice of motion for a judgment, the two principal items of which were, (1) repairs to that portion of Rivermont avenue which was outside of the corporate limits of the city in 1890, and (2) repairs to the Rivermont aqueduct within such corporate limits. The parties waived a jury and submitted all…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Montgomery St. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  2. Lobdell v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Reading v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. City of Noblesville v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Fielders v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Town of Washington GroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Armiger v. LewinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. Fort Worth & D., S. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Richmond-Ashland Railway Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  5. Old Dominion Boat Club v. Alexandria City CouncilSupreme Court of Virginia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API