Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Tackett

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1961No. 6943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

Petitioner is the claimant in an action filed under our workmen’s compensation act for the recovery of benefits provided therein. Respondent is the Judge before whom the cause is pending.

After issue was joined in the compensation case, the petitioner’s deposition was taken at which time counsel for the employer was refused permission to talk to one Dr. Coffey, a physician who had treated petitioner, and petitioner, through his counsel, stated he would refuse to sign a medical authorization permitting such interview.

It appears that petitioner had been seen by three doctors in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. CarmodyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State ex rel. Harvey v. MedlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gilmore v. District Court of Fifth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Game Commission v. TackettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. LarrazoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ash v. HG Reiter CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BaileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API