Legal Opinion

State Game Commission v. Tackett

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1962No. 7073PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in the Supreme Court invoking our jurisdiction in prohibition brought by the State Game Commission of the State of New Mexico against the Honorable Paul Tackett, as Judge of the Second Judicial District sitting by designation in cause No. 32379 in Santa Fe County, New Mexico, wherein Sid West is plaintiff and the state game commission, its individual members and its director are defendants. The proceeding seeks to prohibit the Honorable Paul Tackett, as such judge, from proceeding to hear or determine any matters in said cause in Santa Fe County.

Th…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. CarmodyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State ex rel. Harvey v. MedlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. American Trust & Savings Bank v. ScobeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Burguete v. Del CurtoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Clinton Realty Co. v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Yrisarri v. WallisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API