Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Inskeep

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2005No. 32A05-0504-CV-212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellants-Defendants Ric and Sue Floyd (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the trial court's judgment quieting title in favor of Appellees-Plaintiffs John M. and Deb Inskeep (collectively, "Appellees"). We reverse. 1

Issue

Appellants raise two issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court's judgment quieting title in favor of Appellees, under a theory of adverse possession, is clearly erroneous because it relies upon an improper finding of fact, le., Finding 11, and, further, because the evidence is insufficient to establish that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Echterling Et Ux. v. Kalvaitis Et Ux.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piles v. GosmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Dewart v. HaabIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. William Arnold Henry and Mary Ann Henry v. Margo LiebnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API