Legal Opinion

Piles v. Gosman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2006No. 41A05-0509-CV-563PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Floyd Piles appeals the trial court's denial of his quiet title action and the granting of the counterclaim for declaratory judgment filed by Thomas Gosman. We affirm.

Issue

Piles raises three issues. We address the dispositive issue, which we restate as whether the trial court properly concluded that Gosman had acquired the disputed property by adverse possession.

Facts

From 1967 until 1972, Harold and Virginia Newkirk owned approximately fifty acres of property adjacent to U.S. 831. in Edinburgh. In 1972, they subdivided the property into two parcels and sold a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re the Guardianship of B.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Echterling Et Ux. v. Kalvaitis Et Ux.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Freiburger v. FryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re the Marriage of NickelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Huntington v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Smyth v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Wolfe v. Eagle Ridge Holding Co., LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Country Contractors, Inc., Stephen Songer, and Jahn Songer v. A Westside Storage of Indianapolis, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API