Legal Opinion

State v. Albert

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1997No. 72677PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Phillip Albert appeals the sentence imposed by the common pleas court following his guilty pleas to felonious assault and arson, alleging that the court failed to comply with the provisions of 1995 Am.Sub.S.B. No. 2 at the time it sentenced him to consecutive prison terms on these charges. Because R.C. 2929.19(B) requires the trial court to make a finding that gives its reasons for selecting the sentence imposed if it imposes consecutive sentences, we vacate the order of consecutive sentences and remand this matter to the court for the purpose of reconsidering this matter and, if it decides…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BoltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. GarrardOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. GaryOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. ColegroveOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. Coker, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API