Legal Opinion

United States v. James Grant, III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2012No. 11-50036PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

James Grant III (“Grant”) was convicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm. We consider in this case whether the basis for the search that resulted in Grant’s conviction was so attenuated as to require suppression of the firearms evidence found in the search. The district court held that there was indeed a lack of probable cause to issue the warrant authorizing the search, but invoked the good faith reliance doctrine of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), to permit use of the evidence. We agree as to probable cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Messerschmidt v. MillenderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Citlalli FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Jared Armstrong v. Gerard AsselinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Nicholas NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Volodymyr KvashukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API