Legal Opinion

Kishok Unemployment Compensation Case v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1959No. Appeal, No. 41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

To state the undisputed facts, reflected in the findings of the Board of Review, is to demonstrate the fallacy in the decision in this case.

Claimant had been a payroll clerk in the employ of Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc.; his last day of work *528was March 22, 1958. He was discharged, for willful misconduct connected with his work. The office employes of Atlantic Freight Lines were expected to arrive at their place of employment not later than 9 o’clock a.m. each day. Records made by claimant, in punching a time clock, proved without question: That during 1956 claimant was tardy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Siderio Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Mundy Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co. v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  2. Backer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Ruppert Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API