Kishok Unemployment Compensation Case v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
To state the undisputed facts, reflected in the findings of the Board of Review, is to demonstrate the fallacy in the decision in this case.
Claimant had been a payroll clerk in the employ of Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc.; his last day of work *528was March 22, 1958. He was discharged, for willful misconduct connected with his work. The office employes of Atlantic Freight Lines were expected to arrive at their place of employment not later than 9 o’clock a.m. each day. Records made by claimant, in punching a time clock, proved without question: That during 1956 claimant was tardy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Siderio Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Mundy Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co. v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
- Backer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Ruppert Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963