Legal Opinion

Hauk v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1964No. L.A. 27727PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this proceeding we issued an alternative writ of mandamus for the purpose of reviewing an order of respondent court in which it refused to compel the real parties in interest (hereinafter referred to as defendants) to answer certain questions propounded at their depositions on oral interrogatories.

The unanswered questions relate to defendants’ gains and profits from certain business transactions, and the issue is whether it is within the discretion of the trial court to postpone compelling defendants to answer such questions until plaintiff has first established his right to an accounting.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Singer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Kubatzky v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Smith v. Sikorsky AircraftDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API