Legal Opinion

Durham v. Prime Industrial Recruiters, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 24, 2014No. CV-14-54PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

I,In this workers’ compensation case, the Commission affirmed and adopted the ALJ’s decision, which concluded that William Durham was jointly employed by both Elite Workforce (Elite) and Welspun Pipes (Welspun). Application of the dual-employment doctrine protects Welspun from tort liability under the exclusive-remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act. In this appeal, Durham contends that 1) the Commission’s finding that an implied contract of hire existed between him and Welspun was based upon circular logic, 2) ■ the Commission arbitrarily disregarded all of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Stuyvesant Corp. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Daniels v. Riley's Health & Fitness CentersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Edgin v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Charles v. Lincoln Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. StaffmarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Estate of Bogar v. Welspun Pipes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Emery Humphries v. Fna Group, LLC; And Amtrust North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API