Legal Opinion

Edgin v. Entergy Operations, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1998No. 97-264PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellants Michele and Tracy Edgin filed a negligence action against AppeEee Entergy Operations, Inc., for injuries that Michele Edgin sustained while working at Entergy’s nuclear plant in London as a security guard. During the time she was working at the nuclear plant, Michele Edgin was employed by the Wackenhut Corporation. AppeEants appeal the order of the Pope County Circuit Court granting Entergy’s motion for summary judgment. AppeEants argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the basis of an agreement contained in Michele Edgin’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Isbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Firstbank of Arkansas v. KeelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Daniels v. Riley's Health & Fitness CentersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Bowman v. Sunoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Brown v. SohSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Horner v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Stapleton v. M.D. Limbaugh Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API