Legal Opinion

People v. Muro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed October 28, 1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal both his plea and his sentence as an integral part of an extremely advantageous plea agreement. Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

In any event, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention that his sentence is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API