Estate of Pinkham v. Cargill, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.
[¶ 1] The Estate of Stanley Pinkham (Estate)1 appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Anderson, J.) granting Cargill, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on the Estate’s complaint. The Estate argues that it provided sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact, thereby rendering summary judgment inappropriate. The Estate further argues that the court erred in concluding that the Estate failed to meet its burden of proof to establish facts from which a fact-finder could infer that Cargill’s boneless turkey product was defective. We agree that summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Ex Parte Morrison's Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Porteous v. St. Ann's Cafe & DeliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Matthews v. Campbell Soup CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
- Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Starr Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Mountaire Farms Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- B.T. Management v. 7065-A William Penn HighwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Keralink International, Inc. v. Stradis Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.