Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 29, 2009No. 2007-610PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The defendant, Erie Hebert, challenges his misdemeanor conviction for simple assault. RSA 631:2-a (2007). He argues that the Superior Court {Abramson, J.) erred by permitting the State to introduce evidence of his prior felony conviction under former New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 609(a) and by failing to provide a limiting instruction. We affirm.

I

The jury could have found the following facts based upon the record. The defendant and Eric Picard worked for a drywall business owned by the defendant’s uncle, Gilíes Hebert, who was married to Picard’s sister, Tasha. The defendant and Picard…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. LopezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. State v. O'MALEYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. State v. AinsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. State v. LetendreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. State v. Joseph KuchmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API