State v. Hebert
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The defendant, Erie Hebert, challenges his misdemeanor conviction for simple assault. RSA 631:2-a (2007). He argues that the Superior Court {Abramson, J.) erred by permitting the State to introduce evidence of his prior felony conviction under former New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 609(a) and by failing to provide a limiting instruction. We affirm.
I
The jury could have found the following facts based upon the record. The defendant and Eric Picard worked for a drywall business owned by the defendant’s uncle, Gilíes Hebert, who was married to Picard’s sister, Tasha. The defendant and Picard…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. O'MALEYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. AinsworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. LetendreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. Joseph KuchmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.