Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Centennial Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1993No. G009828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

plaintiffs appeal after the trial court denied their motion for class certification.

Facts

This case basically involves the consolidation of six real estate limited partnerships (which the parties refer to as “the Centennial Partnerships”) and other private companies into a single corporate entity, defendant The Centennial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (which the parties call “New Centennial”). Plaintiffs Shirley Daniels, George Styre, David Robertson and Franklin Stooksberry (collectively the representatives) were former limited partners in the Centennial Partnerships.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bartold v. Glendale Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Hart v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. City of San Diego v. HaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API