Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Rooney v. One 1974 Green Targa Porsche Automobile

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1986No. 16185Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The Court today engages in an impermissible rewriting of I.C. § 37-2744. I can agree with neither the reasoning nor most of the rationale of the majority. In addition, the result achieved in this case is manifestly unfair to the bank and therefore, I dissent.

I

The majority sets the stage to reach its desired result wherein it states that “[t]he central issue in this case is one of statutory construction.” Ante at 433, 732 P.2d at 671. The opinion conveniently omits the first question in any judicial analysis of a statute — is the statute ambiguous? The Court may engage in construction of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ottesen v. Board of Commissioners of Madison CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Worley Highway District v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Blankenship v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. One 1967 Porsche, Model 911-Targa Serial Number 500-677, Motor Number 912-018Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API