Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1930No. 5432PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

Smith was the rear brakeman on a long train of ninety-eight empty coal cars which was proceeding east on defendant’s lines between Russell, Ky., and Danville, W. Va. He was riding in the caboose with the conductor. The train crew had orders to reduce the train to twenty-five ears at Sproul Yards, at which place there were two switches, known as No. 3 and No. 4 switches. The train was to enter No. 3 switch. The head brakeman by error threw No. 4 switch, and the train, travelling about seven or eight miles an hour, proceeded on No. 4 switch eight or ten ear lengths before…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Carpenter v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. Lawrence M. Miller v. Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Noce v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API